The best Self-hosted deployment alternative for agent teams
Compare IQuly and Self-hosted deployment on price, managed operations, and reliability so you can pick the fastest path to production.
How IQuly compares
| Feature | Self-hosted deployment | IQuly |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Infra + ops time | $15/mo |
| One-click provisioning | No | Yes |
| Managed hosting | No | Yes |
| Always online | No | Yes |
| Live support | No | Yes |
| Advanced automation | No | Yes |
| Custom domains | Yes | Yes |
| SSH access | Yes | Yes |
| Drag-and-drop workflows | No | Yes |
Why teams switch from Self-hosted deployment
Self-hosted deployment is known for running your own agent stack on your own servers and tooling. Teams usually move when they need less ops overhead and more predictable performance for hosted agent workloads.
What Self-hosted deployment does well
- - Full control
- - No platform lock-in
Common limitations
- - Highest maintenance burden
- - Requires ongoing ops ownership
Comparing Self-hosted deployment to others?
- Self-hosted deployment vs Railway
- Self-hosted deployment vs Render
- Self-hosted deployment vs Fly.io
- Self-hosted deployment vs DigitalOcean
Other alternatives: